Photocopying the university course material is
the biggest controversy faced by the students of Indian Universities. The legal
action against this act has been taken by three of the world`s leading
publisher: Oxford University Press, Taylor Francis and Cambridge University
Press in order to stop textbook copying. A lawsuit was launched last year against
Delhi University and a photocopy shop nearby the university for producing
photocopied materials from the books and journals and providing them to the
students for their course work.
"Where course packs are available, our books stop selling - even
libraries stop buying multiple copies," says Manas Saikia, Managing Director of
publisher CUP India. "[This affects] the income of authors
and returns to publishers."
This lawsuit was based on a number of claims
by publishers regarding unethical and unauthorized photocopying of their
material. More than $110,000 was demanded by the publishers for the caused
damages.
"The illegal reproduction and sale of infringing copies … is unfair and
cannot be permitted under the Copyright Act, 1957," the lawsuit says.
An immediate action was taken by the Delhi
High Court and they banned the unauthorized reproduction of any sort until the
resolution of this issue.
Many of the academicians based in the UK, the
US, Australia, South Africa, and Argentina raised their voice against this act.
They believed that the publishers are acting in their own interest and that
this type of photocopying is not breaching the parameters of the law and hence acceptable.
According to them, reproduction of publishers’ material through photocopying is
not causing any of them to lose money while it is an important part of
education in India.
Nivedita Menon, one of the professors at the
University of Delhi, expressed his views in the following manner, “The
action is entirely to do with profit, and nothing to do with the authors, whose
living expenses are met by the publicly funded university system, not piddly
royalties,"
The judicial cases in India take many years to
be resolved and this particular case is no different, but its outcome will
undoubtedly leave an enduring impression on the global publishing industry

No comments:
Post a Comment